https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78918
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78918
Christophe Lyon changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78918
--- Comment #8 from Martin Sebor ---
It's an unintended effect of warning during folding. The folder sees the
arguments propagated before the if conditional has been evaluated and before
the call has been eliminated as unreachable. The only way
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78918
--- Comment #7 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko ---
I'm a bit confused:
-- warning about `static inline bar()' inlined into `foo()'
-- and no warning about `baz()'
What is the difference?
May be no warnings will be more consistent?
$ cat x.c
#include
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78918
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78918
--- Comment #5 from Martin Sebor ---
Author: msebor
Date: Sat Dec 16 23:58:34 2017
New Revision: 255755
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255755&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/78918 - missing -Wrestrict on memcpy copying over sel
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78918
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
--- Comment #4 from Martin Sebor -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78918
Florian Weimer changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78918
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78918
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
See Also|
10 matches
Mail list logo