[Bug middle-end/68677] Sibcall doesn't work on function with no return

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68677 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|WONTFIX |DUPLICATE --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pin

[Bug middle-end/68677] Sibcall doesn't work on function with no return

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68677 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/68677] Sibcall doesn't work on function with no return

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68677 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- I believe this is intentional and has been discussed in the past. E.g. one of the often used noreturn functions is abort and its callers, in that case we better not sibcall to that, as it will be harder to fi

[Bug middle-end/68677] Sibcall doesn't work on function with no return

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68677 --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener --- It's a feature for debugging of abort()-like calls. And in this case it's a tailcall as well (which is probably what you are after).