https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66021
--- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski ---
Basically GCC understands that memcpy takes non-null arguments and optimizes
based on that.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66021
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66021
Nuno Lopes changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #35467|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66021
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|critical|normal
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66021
--- Comment #3 from Nuno Lopes ---
Created attachment 35467
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35467&action=edit
reduced test case
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66021
--- Comment #2 from Nuno Lopes ---
Created attachment 35465
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35465&action=edit
test case
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66021
--- Comment #1 from Nuno Lopes ---
Sorry, a bit more information the problem:
On function void
reduce_args_tactic::imp::populate_decl2args_proc::operator()(app * n), when
compiled with -O0 no call to memory::deallocate(void* p) is made, while wi
