https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61762
--- Comment #18 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Fri, 1 Aug 2014, froydnj at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61762
>
> --- Comment #17 from Nathan Froyd ---
> (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61762
--- Comment #17 from Nathan Froyd ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #15)
> Instead aligned the string.
This is kind of unfortunate, as the motivating testcase was something more
like:
...
static const char string[] = "Private";
u
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61762
--- Comment #16 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri Aug 1 12:40:37 2014
New Revision: 213454
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=213454&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-08-01 Richard Biener
PR middle-end/61762
* gcc.dg/pr6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61762
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61762
--- Comment #14 from Richard Biener ---
Argh. Then we fall into the c_strlen wart to not break strlenopt... which
means the fancy folding never triggers.
Oh well. I guess simply XFAIL for strict-align targets.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61762
--- Comment #13 from Richard Biener ---
Does the following additional patch fix the existing testcase?
Index: varpool.c
===
--- varpool.c (revision 213342)
+++ varpool.c (workin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61762
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61762
--- Comment #11 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #10 from Richard Biener ---
[...]
> Patch attached, it may still help SPARC passing the testcase.
The patch doesn't make a difference, unfortunately.
Rainer
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61762
--- Comment #10 from Richard Biener ---
Created attachment 33218
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33218&action=edit
patch
I have a patch but as the relevant folding already triggers during C parsing it
is too early for the cg
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61762
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #9 from Richard Bi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61762
--- Comment #8 from Rainer Orth ---
Created attachment 33196
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33196&action=edit
-fdump-tree-release_ssa dump on sparc-sun-solaris2.11
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61762
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61762
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61762
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri Jul 25 07:44:57 2014
New Revision: 213045
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=213045&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-07-25 Richard Biener
PR middle-end/61762
PR middle-end
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61762
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Ah, no, we've optimized the memcpy to the assignment and so we don't go through
expand_builtin_memcpy then that would be able to handle this.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61762
--- Comment #3 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Thu, 10 Jul 2014, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61762
>
> Jakub Jelinek changed:
>
>What|Removed |Added
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61762
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61762
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
18 matches
Mail list logo
