http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59175
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||areg.melikadamyan at gmail dot
com
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59175
--- Comment #6 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #5)
> It failed when gcc is configured with --with-arch=core2 --with-cpu=atom.
> It can be reproduced with -mtune=atom.
Probably -mtune=generic is needed in options.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59175
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59175
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59175
--- Comment #3 from Jan Hubicka ---
Author: hubicka
Date: Tue Nov 19 01:30:51 2013
New Revision: 204996
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=204996&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/59175
* gcc.target/i386/memcpy-2.c: Fix template;
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59175
--- Comment #2 from Jan Hubicka ---
Hmm, we lose information here since we remove the range expression. I suppose
that problem should be handled independently. I will update the testcase to
new template and add +1 that will introduce new SSA nam
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59175
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ubizjak at gmail dot com
--- Comment #1 fro
