[Bug middle-end/59119] Segfault in -fisolate-erroneous-paths pass

2013-11-13 Thread law at redhat dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59119 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/59119] Segfault in -fisolate-erroneous-paths pass

2013-11-13 Thread law at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59119 --- Comment #3 from Jeffrey A. Law --- Author: law Date: Wed Nov 13 23:10:34 2013 New Revision: 204760 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=204760&root=gcc&view=rev Log: * PR middle-end/59119 * gimple-ssa-isolate-paths.c (find_implicit_err

[Bug middle-end/59119] Segfault in -fisolate-erroneous-paths pass

2013-11-13 Thread law at redhat dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59119 --- Comment #2 from Jeffrey A. Law --- Ah nuts. While pondering this a bit more, I realized we have the same problem in this code that we do in DOM. Namely that we can have references to SSA_NAMEs that have been released to the name manager in

[Bug middle-end/59119] Segfault in -fisolate-erroneous-paths pass

2013-11-13 Thread law at redhat dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59119 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|