https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56552
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56552
--- Comment #7 from Steve Ellcey ---
Author: sje
Date: Mon Nov 18 19:20:12 2013
New Revision: 204979
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=204979&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2013-11-18 Andrew Pinski
Steve Ellcey
PR target/56552
* co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56552
--- Comment #6 from Steve Ellcey ---
Created attachment 31076
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31076&action=edit
Proposed patch I tested
Andrew, is this still on your TODO list? I have attached a patch that I have
tested here.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56552
--- Comment #5 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
---
(In reply to rsand...@gcc.gnu.org from comment #4)
> I've probably missed the bigger picture here, but FWIW, I don't
> see any problem with extending *mov_on_
> to QI and HI. I suppose it would
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56552
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56552
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unas
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56552
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56552
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
