[Bug middle-end/55271] missing warning set-but-unused

2012-11-11 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55271 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug middle-end/55271] missing warning set-but-unused

2012-11-11 Thread dimhen at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55271 --- Comment #2 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko 2012-11-11 18:42:25 UTC --- oh, was over-simplified example. Sorry void f1() { char ch; char *p = &ch; *p = 0; } Now 2 variables are 'set-but-unused'?

[Bug middle-end/55271] missing warning set-but-unused

2012-11-11 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55271 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski 2012-11-11 17:24:19 UTC --- The pointer is used in *li = 0; statement.