[Bug middle-end/55217] False -Wstrict-overflow warning

2022-02-01 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55217 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/55217] False -Wstrict-overflow warning

2021-12-12 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55217 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail||7.5.0 Keywords|

[Bug middle-end/55217] False -Wstrict-overflow warning

2015-11-11 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55217 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2015-11-11 CC|

[Bug middle-end/55217] False -Wstrict-overflow warning

2014-10-03 Thread mickey.veksler at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55217 --- Comment #5 from Michael Veksler --- Running the delta.c example with -fdump-tree-all-all-lineno produces delta.c.125t.vrp2. For some reason, stop_9 (which is the first stop_.* in the file) is initialized with stop_9 = barD.1593 (), but it

[Bug middle-end/55217] False -Wstrict-overflow warning

2014-10-03 Thread manu at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55217 --- Comment #4 from Manuel López-Ibáñez --- (In reply to Michael Veksler from comment #2) > > This make no sense at all and significantly lowers the usability of > -Wstrict-overflow=3. Either VRP or constant-propagation must have realized > that

[Bug middle-end/55217] False -Wstrict-overflow warning

2014-10-03 Thread manu at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55217 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org --- Commen