http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54685
--- Comment #9 from Oleg Endo ---
This is basically the same issue as PR 59533. emit_store_flag_1 in expmed.c
always expands the not-shift because the assumption there is that it's cheaper,
which is not true for SH.
The pre-peephole idea from ht
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54685
--- Comment #8 from Oleg Endo 2013-02-15 21:33:45
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> (In reply to comment #5)
> > FAIL: gcc.target/sh/pr54685.c scan-assembler-not not
> >
> > I'm curious why this fails. On my sh-elf / newlib config it
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54685
--- Comment #7 from Oleg Endo 2013-02-15 21:28:32
UTC ---
Author: olegendo
Date: Fri Feb 15 21:28:26 2013
New Revision: 196092
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196092
Log:
PR target/54685
* gcc.target/sh/
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54685
--- Comment #6 from Kazumoto Kojima 2013-02-05
00:09:01 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> FAIL: gcc.target/sh/pr54685.c scan-assembler-not not
>
> I'm curious why this fails. On my sh-elf / newlib config it passes. Do you
> have any
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54685
Oleg Endo changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comm
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54685
Oleg Endo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|SUSPENDED
--- Comment #4 from Oleg
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54685
Oleg Endo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|target |middle-end
--- Comment #3 from Oleg
