[Bug middle-end/53073] [4.8 Regression] 464.h264ref in SPEC CPU 2006 miscompiled

2013-01-31 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53073 --- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-01-31 09:28:28 UTC --- FYI, regarding validity in C89, the wording there is similar to C99. ISO C89, 6.3.1.2 says that d[++k] is equivalent to: (*((d)+(++k))) and ++k in the last iteration is 16,

[Bug middle-end/53073] [4.8 Regression] 464.h264ref in SPEC CPU 2006 miscompiled

2013-01-31 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53073 --- Comment #11 from Richard Biener 2013-01-31 09:01:02 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Thu Jan 31 09:00:54 2013 New Revision: 195610 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=195610 Log: 2013-01-31 Richard Biener

[Bug middle-end/53073] [4.8 Regression] 464.h264ref in SPEC CPU 2006 miscompiled

2013-01-29 Thread rguenther at suse dot de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53073 --- Comment #10 from rguenther at suse dot de 2013-01-29 09:10:25 UTC --- On Mon, 28 Jan 2013, sje at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53073 > > Steve Ellcey changed: > >What|

[Bug middle-end/53073] [4.8 Regression] 464.h264ref in SPEC CPU 2006 miscompiled

2013-01-28 Thread sje at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53073 Steve Ellcey changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sje at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comme

[Bug middle-end/53073] [4.8 Regression] 464.h264ref in SPEC CPU 2006 miscompiled

2013-01-15 Thread mpaton at swbell dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53073 --- Comment #8 from Michael Paton 2013-01-15 20:01:04 UTC --- Hopefully it's correct to reply to the mailing list rather than to bugzilla. I've tried to find definitive guidance on that and failed. Thanks for your informative reply asser

[Bug middle-end/53073] [4.8 Regression] 464.h264ref in SPEC CPU 2006 miscompiled

2013-01-15 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53073 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Co

[Bug middle-end/53073] [4.8 Regression] 464.h264ref in SPEC CPU 2006 miscompiled

2013-01-15 Thread mpaton at swbell dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53073 Michael Paton changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpaton at swbell dot net --- Co

[Bug middle-end/53073] [4.8 Regression] 464.h264ref in SPEC CPU 2006 miscompiled

2012-11-08 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53073 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||josh.m.conner at gmail dot

[Bug middle-end/53073] [4.8 Regression] 464.h264ref in SPEC CPU 2006 miscompiled

2012-08-20 Thread venkataramanan.kumar at amd dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53073 Venkataramanan changed: What|Removed |Added CC||venkataramanan.kumar at amd

[Bug middle-end/53073] [4.8 Regression] 464.h264ref in SPEC CPU 2006 miscompiled

2012-04-23 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53073 --- Comment #3 from Richard Guenther 2012-04-23 11:44:11 UTC --- Fixed by doing /*= sum up =*/ for (k=0; k < 16; k++) { dd = d[k]; satd += (dd < 0 ? -dd : dd); } instead.

[Bug middle-end/53073] [4.8 Regression] 464.h264ref in SPEC CPU 2006 miscompiled

2012-04-23 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53073 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug middle-end/53073] [4.8 Regression] 464.h264ref in SPEC CPU 2006 miscompiled

2012-04-23 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53073 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0 --- Comment #1 from Richard Guen