http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51323
--- Comment #7 from David Kastrup 2011-11-29 09:43:44 UTC
---
I agree that the real fix is to force an upgrade of the compiler to a fixed
version. However, Ubuntu 11.10 has been released and is in circulation, so we
can't reasonably implement th
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51323
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-11-28
20:38:59 UTC ---
That would be too big hammer approach. While the fix is in arch independent
code, on most architectures you could hit it only with > 6 resp. > 8 arguments
and with similar scenario ea
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51323
--- Comment #5 from David Kastrup 2011-11-28 19:33:26 UTC
---
Question: the proposed fix is in gcc/calls.c which looks somewhat architecture
independent. Am I right in assuming that this means that the bug may manifest
itself under architectures
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51323
--- Comment #4 from David Kastrup 2011-11-28 18:24:10 UTC
---
I can confirm that my version of gcc identifying itself as
gcc version 4.6.1 (Ubuntu/Linaro 4.6.1-9ubuntu3)
makes your test program abort under -O2. If you _cannot_ confirm this with
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51323
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
