http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51200
--- Comment #7 from jye2 at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-29 02:15:37 UTC ---
Author: jye2
Date: Thu Mar 29 02:15:29 2012
New Revision: 185944
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=185944
Log:
2012-03-28 Joey Ye
Backported from m
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51200
--- Comment #6 from jye2 at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-27 02:27:01 UTC ---
Author: jye2
Date: Tue Dec 27 02:26:57 2011
New Revision: 182691
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=182691
Log:
2011-12-26 Joey Ye
Revert original fi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51200
--- Comment #5 from jye2 at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-26 08:43:51 UTC ---
Author: jye2
Date: Mon Dec 26 08:43:48 2011
New Revision: 182685
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=182685
Log:
2011-12-26 Joey Ye
PR middle-end/512
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51200
Joey Ye changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|VERIFIED
--- Comment #4 from Joey Ye 2011-12-2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51200
Bernd Schmidt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51200
--- Comment #2 from Joey Ye 2011-11-22 03:58:29 UTC ---
Here is a test case fix.
With this patch, backend part of Bernd's original patch can be skipped. Thus
DJ's concern of unnecessary change can be addressed.
Also this test case intends to war
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51200
--- Comment #1 from Joey Ye 2011-11-18 02:23:17 UTC ---
A patch is available at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-12/msg00217.html
but is pending for about 1 year.
Latest discussion is at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-11/msg01623.ht
