[Bug middle-end/49378] [4.7 Regression] C++ is broken

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49378 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug middle-end/49378] [4.7 Regression] C++ is broken

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49378 --- Comment #6 from Jan Hubicka 2011-06-12 16:39:41 UTC --- Author: hubicka Date: Sun Jun 12 16:39:38 2011 New Revision: 174969 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174969 Log: PR middle-end/49378 * ipa.c (cgraph_non_loc

[Bug middle-end/49378] [4.7 Regression] C++ is broken

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49378 --- Comment #5 from H.J. Lu 2011-06-12 15:15:09 UTC --- Created attachment 24502 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24502 Preprocessed 32bit future.cc

[Bug middle-end/49378] [4.7 Regression] C++ is broken

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49378 --- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu 2011-06-12 14:51:12 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) > Hi, > looks like I have the lucky kernel. > > I think the problem is that we now mark as local thunks that are not having > address taken that makes i386 BE to u

[Bug middle-end/49378] [4.7 Regression] C++ is broken

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49378 --- Comment #3 from Jan Hubicka 2011-06-12 14:41:18 UTC --- Hi, looks like I have the lucky kernel. I think the problem is that we now mark as local thunks that are not having address taken that makes i386 BE to use register passing conventions

[Bug middle-end/49378] [4.7 Regression] C++ is broken

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49378 --- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu 2011-06-12 13:36:39 UTC --- On x86-64, I got 0006d270 <_ZN12_GLOBAL__N_121system_error_categoryD0Ev>: 6d270: 48 8d 05 79 d4 27 00lea0x27d479(%rip),%rax# 2ea6f0 <_ZTVN12_GLOBAL__N_121sy

[Bug middle-end/49378] [4.7 Regression] C++ is broken

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49378 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Component|c++ |middle-end Target Milestone|---