https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49191
--- Comment #17 from Steve Ellcey ---
Author: sje
Date: Wed Aug 20 15:57:42 2014
New Revision: 214227
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=214227&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-08-20 Steve Ellcey
PR middle-end/49191
* lib/target-support
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49191
--- Comment #16 from Steve Ellcey ---
Author: sje
Date: Wed Aug 20 15:56:45 2014
New Revision: 214226
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=214226&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-08-20 Steve Ellcey
PR middle-end/49191
* doc/sourcebuild.te
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49191
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49191
--- Comment #14 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-06-27
17:55:40 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Jun 27 17:55:35 2011
New Revision: 175544
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175544
Log:
Backported from mainline
2011-06-26 Jakub
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49191
--- Comment #13 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-06-26
07:58:23 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Sun Jun 26 07:57:30 2011
New Revision: 175408
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175408
Log:
2011-06-26 Jakub Jelinek
PR tree-optimizat
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49191
--- Comment #12 from Steve Ellcey 2011-06-08 20:07:04
UTC ---
Checking for a warning using check_no_compiler_messages seems as easy or easier
then checking the return code so I did that. I have submitted a patch to
gcc-patches.
http://gcc.gnu.o
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49191
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49191
--- Comment #10 from Steve Ellcey 2011-06-08 18:12:40
UTC ---
How about compiling this with -Wcast-align and looking for a warning message:
char *y;
typedef char __attribute__ ((__aligned__(__BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT__))) c;
c *z;
void foo(void)
{
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49191
--- Comment #9 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia.nrc.ca 2011-06-08 17:59:18 UTC ---
> Perhaps something like:
> union { int i; char c[8]; } u;
> int
> main ()
> {
> int *p;
> asm volatile ("" : "=r" (p) : "0" (&u.c[1]));
> *p++;
> return 0;
> }
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49191
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #7 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49191
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-06-08
17:48:11 UTC ---
I meant (*p)++; instead of *p++; sorry.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49191
Steve Ellcey changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sje at cup dot hp.com
--- Comment #6 from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49191
--- Comment #5 from Ramana Radhakrishnan 2011-06-07
13:13:59 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> And arm-linux-gnueabi.
Though on ARM I would expect this to pass once we can support unaligned
memcpy's for certain versions of the architecture.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49191
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comm
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49191
John David Anglin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Commen
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49191
--- Comment #2 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-05-27 13:59:11 UTC ---
> Is sparc a strict-alignment target? Then that's expected.
It is.
> Hmm. Not sure we have a dg-effective-target strict-align ...
> so you probably have to add
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49191
--- Comment #1 from richard.guenther at gmail dot com 2011-05-27 13:53:57 UTC ---
On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 3:50 PM, ro at gcc dot gnu.org
wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49191
>
> Summary: gcc.dg/memcpy-3.c FAILs on
17 matches
Mail list logo
