https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48609
--- Comment #9 from Hongtao.liu ---
(In reply to Hongtao.liu from comment #8)
> > You have to do a little bit more. Like change how the extraction for the two
> > parts for the concat.
>
> We already have vec_extractv2sfsf/vec_setv2sf, will debu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48609
--- Comment #8 from Hongtao.liu ---
> You have to do a little bit more. Like change how the extraction for the two
> parts for the concat.
We already have vec_extractv2sfsf/vec_setv2sf, will debug to figure out why
they're not used.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48609
--- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Hongtao.liu from comment #6)
> (In reply to Hongtao.liu from comment #5)
> > (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2)
> > > Confirmed, In this case, it is a middle-end issue, I suspect if we u
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48609
--- Comment #6 from Hongtao.liu ---
(In reply to Hongtao.liu from comment #5)
> (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2)
> > Confirmed, In this case, it is a middle-end issue, I suspect if we used
> > V2SFmode for the incoming argument, it mig
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48609
--- Comment #5 from Hongtao.liu ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2)
> Confirmed, In this case, it is a middle-end issue, I suspect if we used
> V2SFmode for the incoming argument, it might work better. Right now we
Yes, under TAREGT_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48609
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
*** Bug 77851 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48609
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
*** Bug 48607 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48609
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-08-02
Keywords|
