[Bug middle-end/46685] [4.6 Regression] New stack alignment failures with -fpic

2010-12-02 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46685 --- Comment #11 from Eric Botcazou 2010-12-02 11:30:54 UTC --- > Alternatively, we could do something like: > --- gcc/config/sparc/sparc.c.jj2010-11-26 18:39:04.0 +0100 > +++ gcc/config/sparc/sparc.c2010-11-29 15:35:00.727219374 +

[Bug middle-end/46685] [4.6 Regression] New stack alignment failures with -fpic

2010-12-02 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46685 --- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek 2010-12-02 08:40:08 UTC --- I'd actually prefer to go with the sparc.c change (probably including flag_reorder_blocks_and_partition), then hppa could just write its own function_section hook as a wrapper around

[Bug middle-end/46685] [4.6 Regression] New stack alignment failures with -fpic

2010-11-30 Thread dave at hiauly1 dot hia.nrc.ca
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46685 --- Comment #9 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia.nrc.ca 2010-11-30 22:22:22 UTC --- On Tue, 30 Nov 2010, John David Anglin wrote: > > On the other side, the above is still broken with > > -freorder-blocks-and-partition and I guess even before Honza's c

[Bug middle-end/46685] [4.6 Regression] New stack alignment failures with -fpic

2010-11-30 Thread dave at hiauly1 dot hia.nrc.ca
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46685 --- Comment #8 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia.nrc.ca 2010-11-30 21:52:57 UTC --- > On the other side, the above is still broken with > -freorder-blocks-and-partition and I guess even before Honza's change it has > been broken. flag_reorder_blocks_an