http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46685
--- Comment #11 from Eric Botcazou 2010-12-02
11:30:54 UTC ---
> Alternatively, we could do something like:
> --- gcc/config/sparc/sparc.c.jj2010-11-26 18:39:04.0 +0100
> +++ gcc/config/sparc/sparc.c2010-11-29 15:35:00.727219374 +
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46685
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek 2010-12-02
08:40:08 UTC ---
I'd actually prefer to go with the sparc.c change (probably including
flag_reorder_blocks_and_partition), then hppa could just write its own
function_section hook as a wrapper around
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46685
--- Comment #9 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia.nrc.ca 2010-11-30 22:22:22 UTC ---
On Tue, 30 Nov 2010, John David Anglin wrote:
> > On the other side, the above is still broken with
> > -freorder-blocks-and-partition and I guess even before Honza's c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46685
--- Comment #8 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia.nrc.ca 2010-11-30 21:52:57 UTC ---
> On the other side, the above is still broken with
> -freorder-blocks-and-partition and I guess even before Honza's change it has
> been broken.
flag_reorder_blocks_an
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46685
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek 2010-11-29
15:17:30 UTC ---
I guess we could do something like:
--- varasm.c.jj2010-11-29 12:39:07.0 +0100
+++ varasm.c2010-11-29 15:15:53.0 +0100
@@ -534,6 +534,15 @@ section *
default_f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46685
--- Comment #6 from Eric Botcazou 2010-11-29
11:58:56 UTC ---
> What is the assembly difference on SPARC Linux? The only difference I see
> with
> a cross compiler to sparc64-linux, both for -O1 -m32 -mptr32 and -O1 -m64 is
> .section.text.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46685
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46685
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|hppa-unknown-linux-gnu |hppa,sparc-unknown-linux-gn
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46685
John David Anglin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46685
John David Anglin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.0 |---
--- Comment #3 from John David An
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46685
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46685
--- Comment #2 from John David Anglin 2010-11-27
16:53:41 UTC ---
ldo -62(%r30),%r23
bl qsort,%r2
The offset of -62 is misaligned. r23 should point to a plabel.
plabels have to be 4-byte aligned.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46685
--- Comment #1 from John David Anglin 2010-11-27
16:33:36 UTC ---
Although the printouts don't show it, the fails are with -fpic.
The non pic versions don't fail.
In the nested-6.c case, it appears the procedure label for the
call to compare fro
13 matches
Mail list logo
