--- Comment #9 from jd at cococo dot de 2010-07-01 05:37 ---
Ok, but in terms of semantics there is only one way of interpreting the
sentence
nr <= left->rows > right->rows ? left->rows : right->rows
because we have to differ between conditions yielding truth values and
expressions y
--- Comment #8 from redi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-30 17:10 ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> Sorry, I was not precise enough. Delphi is the IDE for both, Pascal and C, and
> what I meant by the word are the language(s) Borland C and C++. They have an
> option for Standard C. Maybe I m
--- Comment #7 from jd at cococo dot de 2010-06-30 16:47 ---
Sorry, I was not precise enough. Delphi is the IDE for both, Pascal and C, and
what I meant by the word are the language(s) Borland C and C++. They have an
option for Standard C. Maybe I misunderstood it ...
--
http://gcc
--- Comment #6 from redi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-30 14:15 ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> Which is the standard C operator precedence?
You can find that for yourself on the web e.g.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operator_precedence_in_C
GCC uses the standard precedence.
> It shou
--- Comment #5 from jd at cococo dot de 2010-06-30 13:43 ---
Which is the standard C operator precedence? It should not depend on the
dialect. Is there a pragma for it?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44681
--- Comment #4 from redi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-30 10:57 ---
Delphi and C have different operator precedence
--
redi at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #3 from jd at cococo dot de 2010-06-30 10:32 ---
You are right - it was a matter of bracketing. After having changed the macro
to
#define max(a,b)(a>b?a:b)
it works fine on MingW and Linux.
The problem lies in an incompatibility between to Delphi 2010. Delphi p
--- Comment #2 from redi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-27 23:31 ---
is this just an operator precedence misunderstanding?
the loop condition expands to
nr <= left->rows > right->rows ? left->rows : right->rows
try adding parentheses to the macro definition
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-27 23:23 ---
Can you provide the preprocessed source? The code snip does not compile
without the definitions of Tree. Oh Can asg/coeff change its arguments.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Re
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|blocker |normal
Component|c |middle-end
h
10 matches
Mail list logo
