--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-14 07:35 ---
> if ((unsigned int)(xCount + 32) < 0x8000)
Yes even though the comparision is done in an unsigned type, the addition is
done in a signed type which means the overflow of that addition is undefined.
So cha
--- Comment #3 from Daniel dot Davies at xerox dot com 2010-06-14 02:49
---
Thank You! Adding the -fwrapv flag fixed the problem.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44530
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2010-06-13 21:58 ---
Subject: Re: New: wrong code due to branch optimization
Sent from my iPhone
On Jun 13, 2010, at 2:34 PM, "Daniel dot Davies at xerox dot com"
wrote:
> When compiled with -03, the attached file prints out an error
--- Comment #1 from Daniel dot Davies at xerox dot com 2010-06-13 21:35
---
Created an attachment (id=20905)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=20905&action=view)
Preprocessed source file
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44530
