--- Comment #4 from jay dot krell at cornell dot edu 2010-05-31 12:14
---
Here is the fix for insn-peep.o (against 4.3, granted):
diff -u -r1.5 genpeep.c
--- gcc/gcc/genpeep.c 14 Apr 2008 12:48:21 - 1.5
+++ gcc/gcc/genpeep.c 31 May 2010 12:14:37 -
@@ -424,6 +424,7 @@
--- Comment #3 from jay dot krell at cornell dot edu 2010-05-30 08:55
---
Hm. There are more. Perhaps better to not compile/lib/link files that can be
easily predicted to have no symbols? Maybe just ignore it. Maybe get Apple to
change ranlib. Maybe they already have.
ranlib: file: ../
--- Comment #2 from jay dot krell at cornell dot edu 2010-05-30 08:06
---
I understand it is "ok".
Question is: Do you want to be warning free?
At what cost?
I think you do, at some finite cost, and I think the change is worthwhile here.
This isn't adding symbols at random, it is adding
--- Comment #1 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-28 13:06 ---
This is OK, those files have only content for certain configurations (with
CLOOG, doloop pattern in the backend, etc.). You should look for a way to
suppress the warning without adding new symbols at random.
--
s
