--- Comment #7 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-29 15:43 ---
Fixed then.
--
jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIR
--- Comment #6 from borntraeger at de dot ibm dot com 2010-06-24 12:35
---
HJ confirmed that the patch worked and Andreas applied the patch. So from my
point of view, the problem is fixed.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44203
--- Comment #5 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-24 11:24 ---
Is this now fixed?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44203
--- Comment #4 from krebbel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-25 11:18 ---
Subject: Bug 44203
Author: krebbel
Date: Tue May 25 11:18:07 2010
New Revision: 159816
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=159816
Log:
2010-05-25 Christian Borntraeger
PR 44203
--- Comment #3 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-05-22 00:12 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> Created an attachment (id=20709)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=20709&action=view) [edit]
> new version of the fix.
>
> There is actually a second bug :-(
> We not on
--- Comment #2 from borntraeger at de dot ibm dot com 2010-05-20 12:28
---
Created an attachment (id=20709)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=20709&action=view)
new version of the fix.
There is actually a second bug :-(
We not only have to replace step with stepsize
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44203
--- Comment #1 from borntraeger at de dot ibm dot com 2010-05-20 08:29
---
Indeed. I think I found a typo when handling array prefetches.
a potential fix might be:
--- gcc/tree-ssa-loop-prefetch.c(Revision 159557)
+++ gcc/tree-ssa-loop-prefetch.c(Arbeitskopie)
@@ -440,
