--- Comment #20 from iains at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-08-11 10:21 ---
also on i686-darwin9, closing as fixed.
--
iains at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #19 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2010-08-06 12:48 ---
>From IRC:
dominiq: r162911 and r162912 ...and no other recent change seems
relevant
dominiq: whether the bug is fixed or just hidden, I can't really
tell at the moment
--
dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr changed
--- Comment #18 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2010-08-06 11:08 ---
AFAICT this pr seems to have been fixed between revisions 162881 (fail) and
162920 (OK) at least on x86_64-apple-darwin10.4.0 (-m32 and -m64) and
powerpc-apple-darwin9 (-m32, see
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfi
--- Comment #17 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2010-07-29
11:15 ---
On x86_64-apple-darwin10, these failures at -m32 and -m64 appear to be
suppressed when building with --enable-checking=release and reappear when
building with --enable-checking=yes.
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/
--- Comment #16 from iains at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-23 13:15 ---
(In reply to comment #15)
> This seems fixed?
well certainly not for 32 bit versions:
as of r162456 (i686) just tested locally and...
... ppc (162433) http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2010-07/msg02130.html
--
--- Comment #15 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-23 11:53
---
This seems fixed?
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Sta
--- Comment #14 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2010-07-11 04:58 ---
*** Bug 44590 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #13 from iains at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-11 00:25 ---
this is still present, AFAICT, for *-*-darwin* at r162047.
Honza, since it was your patch that triggered this, any ideas on what we could
do to debug/solve this one?
in particular this; "error: Inline clone with add
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44121
--- Comment #12 from reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-20 06:25
---
The failure in comment #1 might be related to PR 44206.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44121
--- Comment #11 from iains at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-13 22:52 ---
(In reply to comment #10)
> (In reply to comment #9)
> > Thanks.
>
> between 159348 and 159356
> will try and refine - but those changes look kinda connected
looks like it is 159354.
159353 is OK and the logs for
--- Comment #10 from iains at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-13 21:59 ---
(In reply to comment #9)
> Thanks.
between 159348 and 159356
will try and refine - but those changes look kinda connected
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44121
--- Comment #9 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2010-05-13 20:57
---
Thanks.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44121
--- Comment #8 from iains at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-13 20:31 ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> Yes, we need the help of people running darwin, on x86_64-linux (-m64) too the
> problem cannot be reproduced.
I've just built a reghunt tree ;-)
starting a successive approx. @159348 ...
--- Comment #7 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2010-05-13 20:25
---
Yes, we need the help of people running darwin, on x86_64-linux (-m64) too the
problem cannot be reproduced.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44121
--- Comment #6 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-05-13 20:07 ---
What is the first revision failed on darwin?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44121
--- Comment #5 from iains at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-13 19:41 ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> libstdc++ tests are clean on Linux/ia32 as of revision 159368:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2010-05/msg01212.html
fails also on powerpc-apple-darwin9
last pass from regress:
Date
--- Comment #4 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-05-13 19:23 ---
libstdc++ tests are clean on Linux/ia32 as of revision 159368:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2010-05/msg01212.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44121
--- Comment #3 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2010-05-13 19:12
---
HJ, can you pin point the regressing revision? Thanks.
--
paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #2 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2010-05-13 19:10
---
Seems pretty obvious to me that this is *not* a libstdc++ issue. I'm
tentatively categorizing it as middle-end and adding Honza due to Comment #2.
--
paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com changed:
21 matches
Mail list logo
