http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43251
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43251
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.4.6 |4.4.7
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43251
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.4.5 |4.4.6
--- Comment #14 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-19 09:56
---
(In reply to comment #13)
> Hi!
>
> I was wondering if this bug is likely to be fixed in the next GCC release; is
> this likely to be the case?
Unlikely. Backporting the one-line change will cause massive perfor
--- Comment #13 from a dot kumar at alumni dot iitm dot ac dot in
2010-03-18 19:25 ---
Hi!
I was wondering if this bug is likely to be fixed in the next GCC release; is
this likely to be the case?
Thanks!
Kumar
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43251
--- Comment #12 from bouzim at gmail dot com 2010-03-05 22:01 ---
Current gcc-4_4-branch shows this buggy behavior, and I can confirm that it
goes away after applying the one-line fix in gcc/tree-complex.c as stated by
H.J. Lu. Neither gcc 4.3.x nor gcc 4.5 have this bug, can it please
--- Comment #11 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-04 00:18 ---
(In reply to comment #9)
> (In reply to comment #8)
> > It is a dup of PR 24581. Backporting the gcc/tree-complex.c change
> > in revision 147281:
> >
> > http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?view=revision&revision=147281
> >
--- Comment #10 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-03 22:57
---
Or rather vectorizers differently.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43251
--- Comment #9 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-03 22:53 ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> It is a dup of PR 24581. Backporting the gcc/tree-complex.c change
> in revision 147281:
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?view=revision&revision=147281
>
> to 4.4 fixes this.
If that is t
--- Comment #8 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-03-03 22:49 ---
It is a dup of PR 24581. Backporting the gcc/tree-complex.c change
in revision 147281:
http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?view=revision&revision=147281
to 4.4 fixes this.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 245
--- Comment #7 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-03 22:33 ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> -ftree-vectorize never worked correctly on this testcase
> until PR 24581 is fixed.
Oh no. This is not related to that bug at all since the vectorized code is in
Fortran. And the differe
--- Comment #6 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-03-03 22:30 ---
-ftree-vectorize never worked correctly on this testcase
until PR 24581 is fixed.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 24581 ***
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #5 from a dot kumar at alumni dot iitm dot ac dot in
2010-03-03 20:49 ---
My gfortran details:
Using built-in specs.
Target: x86_64-linux-gnu
Configured with: ../src/configure -v --with-pkgversion='Debian 4.4.3-3'
--with-bugurl=file:///usr/share/doc/gcc-4.4/README.Bugs
--en
--- Comment #4 from a dot kumar at alumni dot iitm dot ac dot in
2010-03-03 20:42 ---
Created an attachment (id=20014)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=20014&action=view)
C program which uses zdrot.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43251
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Known to fail||4.4.3
15 matches
Mail list logo
