--- Comment #9 from meissner at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-10-08 19:00
---
Patch checked into mainline, subversion id 152569.
--
meissner at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #8 from meissner at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-10-08 18:59
---
Created an attachment (id=18754)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18754&action=view)
Patch that fixes the powerpc bootstrap problem.
This is the patch that I checked in that came from Jan Hubick
--- Comment #7 from hubicka at ucw dot cz 2009-10-08 14:18 ---
Subject: Re: [4.5 Regression] GCC does not bootstrap on powerpc64
Hi,
the following patch should fix the problem. I am
bootstrapping/regtesting it at x86_64-linux, but it would be nice to
know if it actually fixes the boot
--- Comment #6 from danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-10-08 13:10 ---
Bootstrap also fails on armv5tejl-unknown-linux-gnueabi:
build/gensupport.o:(.data+0x20): undefined reference to `obstack'
--
danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-10-07 22:37 ---
This part is what is causing it:
! /* When reading back varpool at LTO time, we re-construct the queue in
order
! to have "needed" list right by inserting all needed nodes into
varpool.
!We how
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-10-07 22:34 ---
Reverting just the varpool.c file back to what it was, allows this testcase to
work.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41626
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-10-07 22:25 ---
This testcase works at -O0 but fails at -O1.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
