http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38219
Steven Bosscher changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2011-02-16 18:44:32 |2013-12-27
--- Comment #16 from Steven
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38219
Sean McGovern changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|gseanmcg at gmail dot com |
--- Comment #15 from Sean McGovern 2012
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38219
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
--- Comment #14
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38219
Sean McGovern changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gseanmcg at gmail dot com
--- Comment #13
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38219
Mikael Pettersson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mikpe at it dot uu.se
--- Comment #12
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38219
--- Comment #11 from John David Anglin 2011-02-21
15:51:59 UTC ---
Still fails on hppa1.1-hp-hpux10.20 with 4.6.0 revision 170207.
--- Comment #9 from danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-02 02:29 ---
See the same on hppa1.1-hp-hpux10.20 but not on hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2009-08/msg00185.html
--
danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #8 from bonzini at gnu dot org 2009-03-02 06:11 ---
Subject: Re: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/vrp47.c fails on powerpc
> Is this the same issue, or should I open a different report?
I think it is the same, I will verify.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38219
--- Comment #7 from gerald at pfeifer dot com 2009-03-01 19:26 ---
I'm seeing the same on i386-unknown-freebsd7.1.
PASS: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/vrp47.c (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/vrp47.c scan-tree-dump-times vrp1 "[xy][^ ]* !=" 0
FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/vrp47.c scan-tree-du
--- Comment #6 from bonzini at gnu dot org 2009-02-21 07:28 ---
Subject: Re: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/vrp47.c fails on powerpc
I'd rather do so only on the branch when it is created. I'm pretty
sure this can be fixed, but it's probably not stage4 stuff.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show
--- Comment #5 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2009-02-21
01:25 ---
So should we have...
Index: gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/vrp47.c
===
--- gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/vrp47.c (revision 144342)
+++ g
--- Comment #4 from janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-20 00:22 ---
See the analysis in http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-01/msg00801.html
which skips the test for MIPS targets.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38219
--- Comment #3 from janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-02 00:05 ---
This test also fails on powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu for both -m32 and -m64.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38219
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-23 18:44 ---
The patch which introduced this testcase:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-08/msg01925.html
I thought I reported this failure to Paolo but I can't find the email.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
14 matches
Mail list logo
