--- Comment #32 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2008-09-04 21:05
---
I am closing this bug. We will track PR 37364 separately.
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Comment #31 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-04 18:48
---
Subject: Bug 37243
Author: rsandifo
Date: Thu Sep 4 18:47:35 2008
New Revision: 139993
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=139993
Log:
gcc/
PR middle-end/37243
* ira-build.c (f
--- Comment #30 from hjl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-04 15:47 ---
Subject: Bug 37243
Author: hjl
Date: Thu Sep 4 15:46:05 2008
New Revision: 139987
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=139987
Log:
2008-09-04 H.J. Lu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR rtl-optimizatio
--- Comment #29 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2008-09-04 13:34
---
On ira-merge branch at revision 139972, there are no regression
on Linux/ia32 and Linux/ia64. Linux/x86-64 has regressions:
+FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr34256.c scan-assembler-times mov 2
It is tracked by PR 37364.
--- Comment #28 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2008-09-04 05:45
---
(In reply to comment #23)
> on Linux/ia32. Linux/x86-64 has regressions:
>
> +FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr34256.c scan-assembler-times mov 2
>
I opened PR 37364 to track it.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show
--- Comment #27 from hjl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-04 05:01 ---
Subject: Bug 37243
Author: hjl
Date: Thu Sep 4 05:00:07 2008
New Revision: 139972
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=139972
Log:
2008-09-03 H.J. Lu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR rtl-optimizatio
--- Comment #26 from vmakarov at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-03 20:22
---
Subject: Bug 37243
Author: vmakarov
Date: Wed Sep 3 20:20:57 2008
New Revision: 139952
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=139952
Log:
2008-09-03 Vladimir Makarov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #25 from vmakarov at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-03 20:13
---
Subject: Bug 37243
Author: vmakarov
Date: Wed Sep 3 20:12:27 2008
New Revision: 139949
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=139949
Log:
2008-09-03 Vladimir Makarov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #24 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2008-09-03 20:04
---
(In reply to comment #23)
>
> Linux/ia64 has regressions:
>
> +FAIL: gfortran.dg/list_read_8.f90 -O0 execution test
> +FAIL: gfortran.dg/list_read_8.f90 -O1 execution test
> +FAIL: gfortran.dg/list_read_8.f90
--- Comment #23 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2008-09-03 19:44
---
On ira-merge branch at revision 139942, there are no regression
on Linux/ia32. Linux/x86-64 has regressions:
+FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr34256.c scan-assembler-times mov 2
Linux/ia64 has regressions:
+FAIL: gfortr
--- Comment #22 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2008-09-03 16:05
---
(In reply to comment #7)
> Created an attachment (id=16155)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16155&action=view) [edit]
> Test case from 2006.434.zeusmp
>
> Though fail to extract a smaller case,
--- Comment #21 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2008-09-02 23:52
---
On ira-merge branch at revision 139914, Linux/ia32 has regression:
+FAIL: libgomp.fortran/vla7.f90 -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer execution test
+FAIL: libgomp.fortran/vla7.f90 -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-all-l
--- Comment #20 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2008-09-02 20:40
---
On ira-merge branch at revision 139902, Linux/ia32 has regression:
+FAIL: 21_strings/basic_string/numeric_conversions/char/stoi.cc execution test
+FAIL: 21_strings/basic_string/numeric_conversions/char/stol.cc exe
--- Comment #19 from hjl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-02 18:28 ---
Subject: Bug 37243
Author: hjl
Date: Tue Sep 2 18:27:34 2008
New Revision: 139902
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=139902
Log:
2008-09-02 Vladimir Makarov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR rtl-op
--- Comment #18 from hjl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-02 18:24 ---
Subject: Bug 37243
Author: hjl
Date: Tue Sep 2 18:22:59 2008
New Revision: 139901
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=139901
Log:
2008-09-02 Vladimir Makarov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR rtl-op
--- Comment #17 from hjl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-02 18:17 ---
Subject: Bug 37243
Author: hjl
Date: Tue Sep 2 18:16:24 2008
New Revision: 139900
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=139900
Log:
2008-09-02 H.J. Lu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Backport from main
--- Comment #16 from vmakarov at redhat dot com 2008-08-30 18:52 ---
This is an analysis of the SPEC2006 degradation.
First of all of thanks for reducing the test. I really appreciate
this. Finding it in spec20006 would be very time consuming for me.
The problem looks following
1.
--- Comment #15 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-29 19:46
---
(In reply to comment #14)
> I suspect this patch
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-08/msg01903.html
>
That patch enabled IRA by default, before it was only enabled via the -fira
flag. So please test be
--- Comment #14 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2008-08-29 18:24
---
I suspect this patch
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-08/msg01903.html
is incorrect. Back it out from IRA branch fixed the testcase
in comment #11. I am running SPEC CPU 2000/2006 with IRA
branch using revi
--- Comment #13 from vmakarov at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-29 16:18
---
Subject: Bug 37243
Author: vmakarov
Date: Fri Aug 29 16:16:45 2008
New Revision: 139769
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=139769
Log:
2008-08-29 Vladimir Makarov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #12 from vmakarov at redhat dot com 2008-08-29 15:55 ---
Here is the analysis of regressions on pr36222 and pr36246. PR36222 contains
the following code:
p64:V4SI=vec_concat (p66:V2SI, p65:V2SI) dead p66 and p65
xmm0:V2DI=subreg:V2DI (p64:V4SI)
IRA allocates p65, p66, and p
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfi
22 matches
Mail list logo
