[Bug middle-end/35292] Missing Const Prop -- union fields

2008-02-24 Thread rguenther at suse dot de
--- Comment #3 from rguenther at suse dot de 2008-02-24 21:14 --- Subject: Re: Missing Const Prop -- union fields On Sat, 23 Feb 2008, pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: > --- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-23 05:50 > --- > More than just constant

[Bug middle-end/35292] Missing Const Prop -- union fields

2008-02-22 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-23 05:50 --- More than just constant prop, see PR 25972 for more info on what else it can be done with union in the same way. Actually I think MEM_REF will make it worse and will not help. In fact I still think MEM_REF is a bad

[Bug middle-end/35292] Missing Const Prop -- union fields

2008-02-22 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-22 10:46 --- This is related to PR34043 and will be fixed by tweaking SCCVN and the introduction of MEM_REF. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added -