--- Comment #6 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-22 13:24 ---
Fixed.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
--- Comment #5 from olga at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-21 09:07 ---
Subject: Bug 34701
Author: olga
Date: Mon Jan 21 09:07:12 2008
New Revision: 131689
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=131689
Log:
2008-01-21 Alon Dayan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Olga Golova
--- Comment #4 from olga at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-07 13:11 ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> Ok to submit this patch?
It looks good. Please bootstrap and submit along with the testcase.
Olga
> Alon
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34701
--- Comment #3 from alond at il dot ibm dot com 2008-01-07 13:01 ---
I have tested the following patch. It fixes the problem. All struct-reorg tests
has also passed on my machine.
It looks like the input to malloc was not calculated correctly in case the size
of the structure is not the
--- Comment #2 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-07 10:14 ---
You should be more specific regarding the options you used. Confirmed with
-O -fipa-struct-reorg -fipa-type-escape -fwhole-program.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #1 from alond at il dot ibm dot com 2008-01-07 09:47 ---
(In reply to comment #0)
When looking into try2.c.051i.ipa_struct_reorg, there is something strange like
10=40 there:
:
D.1885_2 = malloc (440);
str1.0_3 = (struct type_struct *) D.1885_2;
10 = 40;
D.1904_18 =
