--- Comment #4 from znmeb at cesmail dot net 2007-10-29 04:37 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> well you need to provide more information really, like a testcase.
>
I uploaded the file that the second compile croaked on. It will take me a while
to come up with a simpler test case ... this
--- Comment #3 from znmeb at cesmail dot net 2007-10-29 04:35 ---
Created an attachment (id=14432)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14432&action=view)
source, gcov output, gcno and gcda files for the first routine
This is the source file that the second compile died o
--- Comment #2 from znmeb at cesmail dot net 2007-10-29 04:30 ---
Created an attachment (id=14431)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14431&action=view)
gcc --dumpspecs, --dumpversion, --dumpmachine
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33936
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-29 04:29 ---
well you need to provide more information really, like a testcase.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
