--- Comment #22 from danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-13 21:40
---
This test stopped failing at revision 127720.
--
danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Comment #21 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2007-07-31
15:30 ---
Subject: Re: FAIL: 23_containers/bitset/cons/16020.cc execution test
> --- Comment #20 from hjl at lucon dot org 2007-07-30 20:41 ---
> Is this related to PR32921? Can you try the patch in commen
--- Comment #20 from hjl at lucon dot org 2007-07-30 20:41 ---
Is this related to PR32921? Can you try the patch in comment 6:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32921#c6
--
hjl at lucon dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Comment #19 from danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-30 20:31
---
Introduced in revision 126326.
--
danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #18 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2007-07-25
23:34 ---
Subject: Re: FAIL: 23_containers/bitset/cons/16020.cc execution test
> > So the aliasing set of bitset<5> is 88 and the store for
> > b.D.57473.D.57333._M_w
> > is done in aliasing set 10. Someone has t
--- Comment #17 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2007-07-25
22:07 ---
Subject: Re: FAIL: 23_containers/bitset/cons/16020.cc execution test
> So the aliasing set of bitset<5> is 88 and the store for
> b.D.57473.D.57333._M_w
> is done in aliasing set 10. Someone has to debu
--- Comment #15 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2007-07-25 21:56 ---
By the way, s390x-linux apparently is also affected...
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32878
--- Comment #16 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-25 21:58
---
;; b.D.57473.D.57333._M_w = 7
(insn 5 4 6
/home/dave/gnu/gcc-4.3/objdir/hppa-linux/libstdc++-v3/include/bitset:572 (set
(reg:SI 94)
(const_int 7 [0x7])) -1 (nil))
(insn 6 5 0
/home/dave/gnu/gcc-4.3/objdir/
--- Comment #13 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2007-07-25
21:53 ---
Subject: Re: FAIL: 23_containers/bitset/cons/16020.cc execution test
> Can you attach the dump of -fdump-rtl-expand-details ?
Attached.
Dave
--- Comment #14 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc do
--- Comment #12 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-25 21:49
---
Can you attach the dump of -fdump-rtl-expand-details ?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32878
--- Comment #11 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-25 21:36
---
So we have:
(insn 6 5 7 2
/home/dave/gnu/gcc-4.3/objdir/hppa-linux/libstdc++-v3/include/bitset:572 (set
(mem/s/c:SI (plus:SI (reg/f:SI 3 %r3)
(const_int 8 [0x8])) [10 b.D.57473.D.57333._M_w+0 S4 A64
--- Comment #8 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2007-07-25
21:31 ---
Subject: Re: FAIL: 23_containers/bitset/cons/16020.cc execution test
The appears to be a problem with the sched passes. If I compile with
-fno-schedule-insns and -fno-schedule-insns2, the test doesn't fau
--- Comment #6 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2007-07-24
19:30 ---
Subject: Re: FAIL: 23_containers/bitset/cons/16020.cc execution test
> 0x00010318 and 0x0001031c are totally bogus. Changing this
> to a middle-end bug.
Here is preprocessed source.
Dave
--- Comme
--- Comment #5 from danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-24 19:22 ---
test01 is miscompiled at O2:
(gdb) disass _Z6test01v
Dump of assembler code for function _Z6test01v:
0x0001030c <_Z6test01v+0>: ldi 7,ret0
0x00010310 <_Z6test01v+4>: stw rp,-14(sp)
0x00010314 <_Z6test01v+8
14 matches
Mail list logo
