--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-23 00:48 ---
The patch which I am testing:
Index: testsuite/gcc.dg/boolcomplex-1.c
===
--- testsuite/gcc.dg/boolcomplex-1.c(revision 0)
+++ testsuite/gcc.dg/bool
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-23 00:29 ---
I have a patch for the C and C++ front-ends, we don't have to change fold at
all.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-03 07:28 ---
Confirmed.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCON
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-25 08:21 ---
if (TYPE_OVERFLOW_UNDEFINED (TREE_TYPE (arg0))
I think we are just checking TYPE_OVERFLOW_UNDEFINED too early.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.3.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31339
