--- Comment #3 from o dot mangold at gmx dot de 2007-03-20 09:21 ---
Maybe I should remark, that on my system the assembler output looks I little
different than yours.
Good:
.L2:
pushl %edi
fildl (%esp)
addl$4, %esp
fstpl (%esp)
call
--- Comment #2 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-19 16:47 ---
On x86 different addressing modes and induction variables are used. Good:
.L2:
movq%r12, 8(%rsp)
addl$1, %ebp
movsd 8(%rsp), %xmm0
callSquare
movsd %xmm0, (%r
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-19 15:47 ---
On the trunk, there is no difference in the assembly produced for PPC-darwin.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---