[Bug middle-end/31263] Misoptimization of constant function expressions

2007-03-20 Thread o dot mangold at gmx dot de
--- Comment #3 from o dot mangold at gmx dot de 2007-03-20 09:21 --- Maybe I should remark, that on my system the assembler output looks I little different than yours. Good: .L2: pushl %edi fildl (%esp) addl$4, %esp fstpl (%esp) call

[Bug middle-end/31263] Misoptimization of constant function expressions

2007-03-19 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-19 16:47 --- On x86 different addressing modes and induction variables are used. Good: .L2: movq%r12, 8(%rsp) addl$1, %ebp movsd 8(%rsp), %xmm0 callSquare movsd %xmm0, (%r

[Bug middle-end/31263] Misoptimization of constant function expressions

2007-03-19 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-19 15:47 --- On the trunk, there is no difference in the assembly produced for PPC-darwin. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added ---