--- Comment #13 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-23 02:17
---
Fixed.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNE
--- Comment #12 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-23 02:17
---
Subject: Bug 31095
Author: pinskia
Date: Wed May 23 01:17:14 2007
New Revision: 124975
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=124975
Log:
2007-05-22 Andrew Pinski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR
--- Comment #11 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-22 22:48
---
Index: builtins.c
===
Here is the patch which fixes the problem:
--- builtins.c (revision 124965)
+++ builtins.c (working copy)
@@ -3485,6 +3485,7 @
--- Comment #10 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-22 22:21
---
#5 0x102946e0 in expand_expr_real_1 (exp=0xf7d53630, target=0x0,
tmode=VOIDmode, modifier=EXPAND_NORMAL, alt_rtl=0x0)
at /home/apinski/src/ptrplus/gcc/gcc/expr.c:8872
(gdb) p debug_generic_expr (exp)
past = t
--- Comment #9 from sje at cup dot hp dot com 2007-05-22 21:27 ---
Is anyone looking at this bug? It seems to have generated a lot of interest.
I can reproduce it on IA64 HP-UX (using the code in comment #1) but when I undo
the change in 119535 (see comment #4) I still get the problem s
--- Comment #8 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-18 21:49 ---
*** Bug 31991 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #7 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-03 22:06 ---
*** Bug 31805 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #6 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-02 23:01 ---
gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/st_function.f90 at -O1 and above fail the same
way (it is the same bug, I looked into the failure, though it does not use
bcopy so that work around will not work).
--
pinskia at g
--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-30 19:39 ---
The problem is obvious, we don't optimize bcopy not to a call during expand but
this is ok, the issue is we are trying to expand a COMPOUND_EXPR which came
from simplifying bcopy which really should have been done ea
--- Comment #4 from janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-30 19:33 ---
The same failure occurs on powerpc-linux, where a regression hunt identified
this patch:
http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?view=rev&rev=119535
r119535 | hubicka | 2006-12-05 10:15:28 + (Tue, 05 Dec 2006)
--
--- Comment #3 from tbm at cyrius dot com 2007-04-29 13:36 ---
Janis, can you do a regression hunt on this one?
--
tbm at cyrius dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #2 from tbm at cyrius dot com 2007-03-09 11:11 ---
I've confirmed that this doesn't happen with 4.2.0 20070309.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31095
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|tree-optimization |middle-end
Target Milestone|--- |4.3.0
ht
13 matches
Mail list logo
