--- Comment #8 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-20 17:50 ---
Subject: Bug 30143
Author: pinskia
Date: Wed Dec 20 17:50:17 2006
New Revision: 120080
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=120080
Log:
2006-12-20 Andrew Pinski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR mi
--- Comment #7 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-16 02:29 ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> Oh and I messed up somewhere still with my current patch, most likely forgot
> to
> set DECL_GIMPLE_REG_P for the variable.
Yep that what it was, I have a fix now.
--
http://gcc.gnu.o
--- Comment #6 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-16 02:27 ---
Oh and I messed up somewhere still with my current patch, most likely forgot to
set DECL_GIMPLE_REG_P for the variable.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30143
--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-15 22:53 ---
Here is a testcase that fails without the verifier installed:
int f (int n)
{
int i;
_Complex float t;
#pragma omp parallel
for (i = 1; i < n - 1; ++i)
t+=1;
}
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_b
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-15 08:37 ---
I have a new fix which does not cause PR 30167 this time.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30143
