[Bug middle-end/30142] [meta-bug] invalid gimple

2011-11-17 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30142 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug middle-end/30142] [meta-bug] invalid gimple

2009-01-01 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-02 00:16 --- Subject: Bug 30142 Author: pinskia Date: Fri Jan 2 00:14:47 2009 New Revision: 143001 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=143001 Log: 2009-01-01 Andrew Pinski PR middle-end/30142

[Bug middle-end/30142] [meta-bug] invalid gimple

2009-01-01 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-01 23:51 --- The INDIRECT_REF part was posted at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-01/msg00023.html I have to redo the other part later because of tuples changes, MODIFY_EXPR/GIMPLE_MODIFY_STMT is lost. -- http://gcc.g

[Bug middle-end/30142] [meta-bug] invalid gimple

2009-01-01 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-01 22:07 --- Well that and make MODIFY_EXPR invalid for tuples. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30142

[Bug middle-end/30142] [meta-bug] invalid gimple

2009-01-01 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-01 22:06 --- I will test the patch for the invalid INDIRECT_REF issue but the other one needs a slight rewrite as it no longer applies to tuples. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed

[Bug middle-end/30142] [meta-bug] invalid gimple

2008-07-14 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-14 12:44 --- I am no longer to fix this one, Guess nobody cares about the invalid gimple that is produced. Hopefully tuples fixes up most of these issues. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Remov