--- Comment #8 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-16 05:48 ---
No testcase in 3 months so closing.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #7 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-16 21:20 ---
Waiting for a real testcase then.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #6 from kalium at gmx dot de 2006-09-16 21:17 ---
Like I already said, this has nothing to do with hardened extensions. Look at
my patch. It is a problem related to the parser: bad code gets produced when
"XWindowAttributes a;" is not at the beginning.
--
kalium at gmx do
--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-16 21:13 ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> I will not give an isolated test case, but the information on
> http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=133301 may even help more.
SSP is not part of GCC until 4.x so we really cannot suppo
--- Comment #4 from kalium at gmx dot de 2006-09-16 16:54 ---
Note: the words "under hardened" in the title of the Gentoo Linux bug report
are wrong -- the problem also occurs with a plain vanilla/non-hardened gcc.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29109
--- Comment #3 from kalium at gmx dot de 2006-09-16 16:52 ---
So you have a long-developed and relatively stable and good compiler and you
don't develop it any more? Not good. The 4+ branch is pretty unstable. I had
to downgrade the gcc 4.1.1 compiler on my Athlon XP and on my VIA C3 sy
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-16 16:43 ---
We need a self contained testcase for this issue.
Really reporting 3.4.x bugs means you will not see this fixed as 3.4.x is no
longer supported.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Rem
