--- Comment #6 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-15 17:23 ---
Subject: Bug 27781
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Jun 15 17:23:41 2006
New Revision: 114681
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=114681
Log:
2006-06-16 Richard Guenther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR
--- Comment #5 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2006-06-15 15:30 ---
Subject: Bug number PR27781
A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker.
The mailing list url for the patch is
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-06/msg00808.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/sh
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27781
--- Comment #4 from trini at kernel dot crashing dot org 2006-06-01 18:36
---
(In reply to comment #3)
> Actually no, you have to use -fPIC to get this not to be optimized, otherwise
> func will be bound locally which is not what you want.
Two things. First, that's a change in behavio
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-28 15:23 ---
Actually no, you have to use -fPIC to get this not to be optimized, otherwise
func will be bound locally which is not what you want.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
