[Bug middle-end/26439] [4.2 Regression] missing VOPs for complex assignments

2006-02-24 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #8 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-24 18:22 --- Actually never mind I see the issue now but I still say this is a latent bug and not really my bug. And the patch is wrong anyways in general as most of those places really should have been testing something like

[Bug middle-end/26439] [4.2 Regression] missing VOPs for complex assignments

2006-02-24 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #7 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-24 17:46 --- (In reply to comment #6) > Actually I cannot reproduce this with "4.2.0 20060218" either on x86? What > were you doing to reproduce this? Or even the 20th. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26439

[Bug middle-end/26439] [4.2 Regression] missing VOPs for complex assignments

2006-02-24 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-24 17:36 --- Actually I cannot reproduce this with "4.2.0 20060218" either on x86? What were you doing to reproduce this? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26439

[Bug middle-end/26439] [4.2 Regression] missing VOPs for complex assignments

2006-02-24 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-24 17:34 --- Actually this looks like it is x86 specific. Please next time add the target if you think it is x86 specific and also pelase mention this was also using the C++ front-end. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org chang

[Bug middle-end/26439] [4.2 Regression] missing VOPs for complex assignments

2006-02-24 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26439

[Bug middle-end/26439] [4.2 Regression] missing VOPs for complex assignments

2006-02-24 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-24 17:32 --- Actually I could not reproduce this with "4.2.0 20060221"? Is it only with the patch to fix PR 26421? -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added --

[Bug middle-end/26439] [4.2 Regression] missing VOPs for complex assignments

2006-02-23 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-23 16:16 --- Fixed. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRM

[Bug middle-end/26439] [4.2 Regression] missing VOPs for complex assignments

2006-02-23 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-23 16:03 --- Subject: Bug 26439 Author: rguenth Date: Thu Feb 23 16:03:47 2006 New Revision: 111389 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=111389 Log: 2006-02-23 Richard Guenther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PR

[Bug middle-end/26439] [4.2 Regression] missing VOPs for complex assignments

2006-02-23 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-23 12:20 --- I'm working on a fix. find_func_aliases needs to handle complex types like AGGREGATE_TYPE_P types. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26439