--- Comment #15 from dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-02 12:37
---
Fixed. http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-02/msg00121.html
--
dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Comment #14 from dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-02 12:27
---
Subject: Bug 25990
Author: dnovillo
Date: Thu Feb 2 12:27:02 2006
New Revision: 110511
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=110511
Log:
PR 25990
* tree-cfg.c (move_block_to_fn)
--- Comment #13 from dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-01 22:36
---
(In reply to comment #11)
> I still get a segfault for the testcase in comment #6.
> This is revision 110467 on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu.
>
Ah, yes. I had failed to notice the failure is on x86_64. Sorry about t
--- Comment #12 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-01 18:06
---
I can still confirm it too.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #11 from reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-01 16:19
---
I still get a segfault for the testcase in comment #6.
This is revision 110467 on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu.
Note, that this is with the C frontend:
gcc -fopenmp --param ggc-min-expand=0 --param ggc-min-heapsize=0
--- Comment #10 from dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-01 16:05
---
I can't reproduced this with [EMAIL PROTECTED] nor [EMAIL PROTECTED] Could you
please
try again?
--
dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Comment #9 from tbptbp at gmail dot com 2006-02-01 14:28 ---
And you can add PR 25983 on top of it :)
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25990
--- Comment #8 from dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-01 12:56
---
Mine.
--
dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassig
--- Comment #7 from reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-01 12:38
---
Hi Diego,
did you have a look at this one?
This makes -fopenmp almost unusable for the C++ frontend.
PR 26032 is probably a duplicate of this one.
I stumbled over the bug independently, too.
--
http://gcc.gnu
--- Comment #6 from reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-27 15:18
---
Even simpler testcase:
==
void foo()
{
int i;
for ( i=0; i<1; i++ ) ;
for ( i=0; i<1; i++ ) ;
for ( i=0; i<1; i++ ) ;
for ( i=0; i<1; i++ ) ;
for ( i=0; i<1;
--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-27 14:22 ---
Reduced testcase:
__strcspn_c2 (__const char *__s, int __reject1, int __reject2)
{
int m = 1,n = 1,s = 1;
int DD,EE,num_s;
int m_max = 99;
int n_max = 00;
for ( n = 1 ; n <= 99 ; n++ )
for ( m = 1 ; m <
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-27 14:11 ---
Reducing.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25990
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-27 14:09 ---
You can reproduce this with -std=c99 -fopenmp --param ggc-min-expand=0 --param
ggc-min-heapsize=0
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-27 12:58 ---
This is a GC failure:
#0 ggc_set_mark (p=0xafafafafafafafaf) at
/home/pinskia/src/checkin/trunk/gcc/ggc-page.c:588
#1 0x00620268 in gt_ggc_mx_basic_block_def (x_p=Variable "x_p" is not
available.
) at gtype
14 matches
Mail list logo
