--- Comment #10 from bonzini at gnu dot org 2006-01-24 14:30 ---
Patch committed.
--
bonzini at gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #9 from bonzini at gnu dot org 2006-01-24 14:29 ---
Subject: Bug 25905
Author: bonzini
Date: Tue Jan 24 14:29:25 2006
New Revision: 110170
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=110170
Log:
2006-01-23 Paolo Bonzini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR rtl-optimi
--- Comment #8 from joel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-23 20:42 ---
sh-rtems fails to build also. Andrew thought it was related so I am adding
myself and this link to my failure post.
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2006-01/msg00869.html
--
joel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
--
bonzini at gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |bonzini at gnu dot org
|dot org |
--- Comment #7 from kkojima at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-23 08:47 ---
*** Bug 25919 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
kkojima at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #6 from bonzini at gnu dot org 2006-01-23 08:28 ---
Uhm, expand has a bug and creates an invalid
(insn 11 7 12 2 (set (subreg:SI (reg:QI 33) 0)
(zero_extract:SI (mem/s:QI (reg/v/f:SI 31 [ ob ]) [0 S1 A8])
(const_int 8 [0x8])
(const_int 1 [0x1]
--- Comment #5 from bonzini at gnu dot org 2006-01-23 08:22 ---
I cannot reproduce Paul's testcase, but I found this one:
struct object
{
unsigned long mixed_encoding:1;
unsigned long encoding:8;
}
__attribute__ ((packed));
int search_object (struct object *ob)
{
return o
--- Comment #4 from bonzini at gnu dot org 2006-01-23 08:14 ---
The ICE is the same, but the cause is probably different as 25890 is an
ICE-on-undefined.
I think it's easiest to punt and return failure instead of asserting, but I
want to investigate how we reach the assertion failure in
--- Comment #3 from pbrook at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-22 13:41 ---
Smaller testcase:
void
read_encoded_value_with_base (const unsigned char *p, unsigned * val)
{
union unaligned
{
unsigned short u2;
}
__attribute__ ((__packed__));
const union unaligned *u = (const union
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-21 23:44 ---
I think this is related to PR 25890 which is reproducible on x86_64-linux-gnu
also.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot
|
--- Comment #1 from schwab at suse dot de 2006-01-21 23:25 ---
Created an attachment (id=10696)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10696&action=view)
Testcase
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25905
12 matches
Mail list logo
