[Bug middle-end/25657] runtime error with 200.sixtrack benchmark

2006-01-04 Thread uttamp at us dot ibm dot com
--- Comment #9 from uttamp at us dot ibm dot com 2006-01-04 16:51 --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 25578 *** -- uttamp at us dot ibm dot com changed: What|Removed |Added --

[Bug middle-end/25657] runtime error with 200.sixtrack benchmark

2006-01-04 Thread uttamp at us dot ibm dot com
--- Comment #8 from uttamp at us dot ibm dot com 2006-01-04 16:50 --- This has been fixed with todays mainline tree. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25657

[Bug middle-end/25657] runtime error with 200.sixtrack benchmark

2006-01-03 Thread uttamp at us dot ibm dot com
--- Comment #7 from uttamp at us dot ibm dot com 2006-01-04 02:02 --- Yes, I'll. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25657

[Bug middle-end/25657] runtime error with 200.sixtrack benchmark

2006-01-03 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-04 01:52 --- Oh, I forgot to mention that the patch which caused PR 25578 was: 2005-12-23 Paolo Bonzini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25657

[Bug middle-end/25657] runtime error with 200.sixtrack benchmark

2006-01-03 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-04 01:49 --- I wonder if this is related at all to PR 25578 which was just fixed today: 2006-01-03 Paolo Bonzini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PR rtl-optimization/25578 * combine.c (combine_simplify_rtx, force_to_mode):

[Bug middle-end/25657] runtime error with 200.sixtrack benchmark

2006-01-03 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-04 01:46 --- (In reply to comment #2) > And SuSE's tester: > http://www.suse.de/~gcctest/SPEC/CFP/sb-vangelis-head-64/recent.html Oh, that is a x86_64, SuSE's ppc64 tester looks to be down. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/sh

[Bug middle-end/25657] runtime error with 200.sixtrack benchmark

2006-01-03 Thread uttamp at us dot ibm dot com
--- Comment #3 from uttamp at us dot ibm dot com 2006-01-04 01:46 --- peak options are, "-O3 -mcpu=power4 -ffast-math -ftree-loop-linear -funroll-loops -fpeel-loops -m32" base options are, "-O2 -mcpu=power4 -m32" -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25657

[Bug middle-end/25657] runtime error with 200.sixtrack benchmark

2006-01-03 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-04 01:27 --- And SuSE's tester: http://www.suse.de/~gcctest/SPEC/CFP/sb-vangelis-head-64/recent.html -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25657

[Bug middle-end/25657] runtime error with 200.sixtrack benchmark

2006-01-03 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-04 01:23 --- Hmm, this seems to work on Diego's tester on powerpc64-linux-gnu: http://people.redhat.com/dnovillo/spec2000.ppc64/gcc/log/20060103/CFP2000.084.html What options are you using? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/sh