--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-29 20:42 ---
if you want aligned arrays use attribute aligned. Now GCC should automatically
doing it for non -Os/stack saving mode for optimization reasons but other than
that, you cannot depend on the alignment.
--
http://
--- Comment #3 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-29 20:06 ---
As of comment #2 this is a possible enhancement for non -Os (or stack saving
mode) on STRICT_ALIGNMENT targets.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Additional Comments From wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-22
20:10 ---
I think the 16-byte over-alignment in gcc-3.x is a mis-feature. Anything over
8-byte alignment here is useless.
However, I also think the 4-byte alignment in gcc-4.0 is a mis-feature. It just
looks wierd t
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-22
18:05 ---
Huh? I don't understand what do you mean by stack slots because there is no
such thing in GCC.
Do you mean you want disk_stat aligned to 16 byte?
Note the alignment of disk_stat is 4byte so GCC should not
