https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21474
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||10.1.0, 9.1.0
Status|NEW
--- Comment #3 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-15 17:03 ---
I think it is odd that if you call subr(i,0), it doesn't crash, that is &(p->a)
does not actually dereferences p. Nonetheless, I agree that the behaviour seems
inconsistent. A nice little project for someone. As they sa
--- Additional Comments From trt at acm dot org 2005-05-12 15:08 ---
I think it is reasonable to assume the address of an auto variable is non-NULL,
and so the address of anything in the local "int x[10];" is non-NULL.
So gcc can (and does) fold "if (x) ..." and "if (&x[0]) ..."
gcc doe
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-09
17:26 ---
Actually I don't think it is safe to fold any of these.
--
What|Removed |Added
Comp
