--- Comment #14 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-18 08:52
---
The situation of a variable-size return value is not handled. The only
gimple I could envision is a GIMPLE_CALL with the W_S_E on the lhs. Ugh.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21374
--- Comment #13 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-18 00:40
---
*b.9 = [with_size_expr] WITH_SIZE_EXPR ;
When is WITH_SIZE_EXPR supposed to be resolved?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21374
--- Comment #12 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-18 00:38
---
We get a different ICE on the trunk:
unhandled expression in get_expr_operands():
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21374
--- Comment #11 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-04 12:26
---
GCC 4.3.4 is being released, adjusting target milestone.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Comment #10 from jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-03-31 18:45 ---
Closing 4.2 branch. It seems we had agreement in this PR to remove the
feature without a deprecation period.
--
jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
