https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21132
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Hans-Peter Nilsson from comment #4)
> (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2)
> > >1. While working on this I noticed that genpreds treats
> >
> > Fixed/changed with r6-1344.
> >
> >
> > I
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21132
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21132
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2)
> >1. While working on this I noticed that genpreds treats
>
> Fixed/changed with r6-1344.
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2015-May/420317.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21132
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
>1. While working on this I noticed that genpreds treats
Fixed/changed with r6-1344.
I think that is the only ask in this bug report, is that correct?
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-21
00:40 ---
Confirmed, I am going to add the keyword to ice on valid as it could an ICE on
valid code.
--
What|Removed |Added
---
