--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|3.4.4 |4.0.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19698
--- Additional Comments From steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-20
11:11 ---
Should be fixed now...
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-20
11:09 ---
Subject: Bug 19698
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-02-20 11:09:16
Modified files:
gcc: ChangeLog cfgloop.c flow.c function.h
--- Additional Comments From steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-13
23:44 ---
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-02/msg00655.html
--
What|Removed |Added
Key
--- Additional Comments From steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-13
21:24 ---
...and the hammer branch does not fail this test case because it has Zdenek's
patch on it. Well, that explains - and gives me some more confidence to
submit it for GCC 4.0 too.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/b
--- Additional Comments From steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-12
15:33 ---
More context on this bug:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2003-12/msg01946.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19698
--- Additional Comments From ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-31
07:38 ---
> You probably mean this patch???
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2003-01/msg02059.html
Yep.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19698
--- Additional Comments From steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-31
07:33 ---
You probably mean this patch???
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2003-01/msg02059.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19698
--- Additional Comments From ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-31
07:22 ---
> The hammer branch still does not exhibit the problem.
Ask Zdenek, he had a patch for this long-standing problem. I even tried to have
it included in the FSF tree at some point, but failed.
--
--- Additional Comments From schwab at suse dot de 2005-01-31 00:19 ---
The hammer branch still does not exhibit the problem.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19698
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-31
00:15 ---
(In reply to comment #10)
> Ok, so this is a _very_ old bug, reproducable even with 3.0.
Yes but it still an user visible regression and will most likely show up more
and more with the
optimizations happe
11 matches
Mail list logo