https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115581
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Barnabás Pőcze from comment #3)
> Isn't your testcase a bit different? I guess my question is, why does gcc
> feel the need to make a local copy of a by-value argument when calling a
> function
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115581
--- Comment #3 from Barnabás Pőcze ---
Isn't your testcase a bit different? I guess my question is, why does gcc feel
the need to make a local copy of a by-value argument when calling a function
with a reference to it, but seemingly only in a fu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115581
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
Note it looks like clang does some front-end optimization for converting the
lambda into a function pointer because my example in comment #1 has the copy
still there for clang/LLVM.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115581
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115581
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Component|other
