https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113694
--- Comment #4 from Matheus Afonso Martins Moreira ---
(In reply to Sam James from comment #3)
> Note that this isn't something GCC offers for other things, e.g. PR97119.
GCC does offer it for at least one thing that I'm aware of:
-e entry
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113694
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
See Als
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113694
--- Comment #2 from Matheus Afonso Martins Moreira ---
That's true but in that case the __stack_chk_* symbols will remain in the
compiler output and in the final binary. They will show up in readelf output,
GDB function disassemblies.
I think t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113694
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener ---
You could provide an alias to __stack_chk_guard/__stack_chk_fail in your code
though.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113694
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
