https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113596
--- Comment #12 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7117e1f6bf6de25c1ff26c4d7abcc79b407ca221
commit r15-125-g7117e1f6bf6de25c1ff26c4d7abcc79b407ca221
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: F
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113596
--- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek ---
In reply to Richard Biener from comment #10)
> We can make ->calls_alloca more precise though of course
> we usually also do not want to inline functions with VLAs.
Yes. Or remember while inlining whether
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113596
--- Comment #10 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #9)
> Created attachment 57215 [details]
> gcc14-pr113596.patch
>
> Untested patch to do that.
> The disadvantage of doing that is that it may penalize inline calls
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113596
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 57215
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=57215&action=edit
gcc14-pr113596.patch
Untested patch to do that.
The disadvantage of doing that is that it may penalize inline
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113596
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #8
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113596
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener ---
In theory, if somebody really wanted it, we could replace alloca with
__builtin_stack_save/restore during inlining (not sure if it would
simply work, and be efficient, by just putting save at the start of t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113596
John Sanpe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113596
--- Comment #5 from John Sanpe ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #3)
> The documentation should be more clear on this though.
But adding a hint would also be reasonable
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113596
--- Comment #4 from John Sanpe ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> Why do you think this is a bug?
>
> You are forcing a function which calls alloca to be inlined, GCC DOES not
> normally inline functions which call alloca due to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113596
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||documentation
--- Comment #3 from Andre
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113596
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
You could instead use VLA which is done correctly though.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113596
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Why do you think this is a bug?
You are forcing a function which calls alloca to be inlined, GCC DOES not
normally inline functions which call alloca due to not restoring the stack
pointer after the return
12 matches
Mail list logo
